Wednesday, November 27, 2019

Women in Business essays

Women in Business essays The Glass ceiling is an unacknowledged discriminatory barrier that prevents women from rising to positions of power or responsibility, within a corporation. This obstacle is faced by thousands of women trying to fulfill their career goals and objectives. The following article will explore how the glass ceiling works, who it affects and what can be done to minimize this problem. Women account for 43% of the total Australian Workforce, yet an estimated 5% of the directors of Australia's 500 largest companies are women. From our 50 biggest listed companies only 2 have female chief executives. This gender imbalance is not an indication of the ability or professionalism of women, but is a testimony to the power, influence and prejudice of men (Jory, 2003:1). Men have always detained the most senior ranking positions in Australia, and there's still a big factor of the old boys club in the corporate world. All of these factors contribute to the shatter proof glass that for so long has confined women to the lower ranks of the corporate world. As mentioned the issue of the Glass Ceiling is due not to the capability or aptitude of women, but one reason that is repeatedly knowledge lack of there experience. Recently there have been calls for women to increase their line experience. This is yet another attempt to explain the glass ceiling, it is suggested the prerequisite was just another form of discrimination against women, because most male directors been chief executives. "Only about 35% of men currently on boards have CEO experience. What do the remaining 65% have? When will the excuses end?" (Heilemann, 2003:1). Therefore, there is no merit in this explanation of the glass ceiling. One of the difficulties facing women is attributed to taking time out to have and raise children. After raising children women find it difficult to re - enter the work force and to be promoted. Women for some reason find it easier to progress t ...

Saturday, November 23, 2019

MAT117 Week 1 DQ 2 Essay

MAT117 Week 1 DQ 2 Essay MAT117 Week 1 DQ 2 Essay MAT 117 /MAT117 Course Algebra 1B MAT 117 /MAT117 Week 1 Discussion Question Version 8 Week 1 DQ 2 1. Do you always use the property of distribution when multiplying monomials and polynomials? Explain why or why not. 2. In what situations would distribution become important? 3. Provide an example using the distributive property for your classmates to solve or evaluate. RESPONSE A monomial is a number, a variable, or a product of numbers and variables raised to natural number powers... Monomials do not contain division by variables. Also, if an expression contains addition or subtraction signs, it is not a monomial. Polynomials are the sum of two or more monomials. Distribution property is used frequently when multiplying monomials and polynomials. It is not always required however. If there is not a variable before parentheses, it is not needed. x(7-2) would required distributing x to both terms in the parentheses. 7-2 however does not require distribution. An example of an equation requiring distribution is: 2(3^3) - (6/2)^3 RESPONSE 2 After reading the text, I learned that the property of distribution is always used when multiplying monomials and polynomials. If you are multiplying a monomial and a polynomial you would use the distributive property to multiply the monomial but the terms of the polynomial. When multiplying a polynomial by a polynomial, it is important to multiply each term of the first polynomial by all of the terms in the second polynomials. Once the expressions are simplified the next step would be to combine like terms. If there is no value for the variable listed, then the expression is complete in its simplified form. The distribution property becomes important when you are multiplying monomials and polynomials. When you have two sets of polynomials multiplied together, it is important to make sure each part of the expression is simplified. By multiplying every term in the first polynomial by the terms in the second. By doing this you will get what each term equals and then you can simplify the expression. My example for the class to evaluate is (7x + 2)(3x + 4). RESPONSE 3 From based off what I was reading in the book it states that the property of distrubution when multiplying monomials and polynomials is commonly and frequently used at all times along with using the product rule when multiplying monomials and polynomials. The reason that the property of distribution is used frequently when multiplying monomials and polynomials is because a monomial consists of one term, whereas a polynomial consists of one or more terms separated by + or - signs and in order to solve these problems in which you need to multiply a monomial by a polynomial, you have to apply the distributive properties and the product rule. The situations in which distribution would become very important is would be when you are going to have to multiply a monomial by a polynomial, which in that case you would have to apply the distributive properties. The example I will give the class to use is the following: 12(9x - 18) RESPONSE 4 When multiplying both monomials and polynomials, you must always use the property of distribution if there is a variable before the parentheses. For instance in the given example: ab(12 +6) you would need to distribute ab to each of the terms in the parentheses, so you would end up with 12ab + 6ab. If there were no variable in front of the parentheses, it would just be simple addition 12 + 6, less the distribution of any other terms so the distributive property would not be necessary. It is important to remember that a monomial usually consists of one term, where a polynomial consists of one or more than one term. However, the polynomial is usually separated by the â€Å"+† or â€Å"-â€Å"signs, but remember you can multiply monomials and polynomials that have more than one variable too. Here is an example for you, the class to solve: 5(15x + 25)

Thursday, November 21, 2019

Managing for Competitive Advantage Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2500 words

Managing for Competitive Advantage - Essay Example t would be known as the Chip and PIN programme bringing banks, building societies and retailers together to combat the ever expansive problem of credit and debit card fraud. The trial began in fiscal year 2003 where cardholders would authorise purchases with the use of a Personal Identification Number (PIN) in place of their signature. (M&S Annual Review 2003 inside cover operating highlights) Year 2003 HR – Improvement in quality was managed in several ways including reconstitution of the store management structure including the presence of a store manager at each of the stores. Each of these store managers would have clear goals, responsibilities and accountability. There would be a field-based area management team offering the benefit of internal and external experience, which brings M&S in line with leading industry standards, thus providing a basis for further improvement in customer service, leadership and overall store standards. (M&S Annual Review 2003 inside cover operating highlights) Year 2003 Operations –There was increased market share in Women’s, Menswear and Lingerie with both strong product appeal and quality. The opening of thirteen Simply Food stores garnered 250,000 new customers shopping per week and the pilot program of the new credit and loyalty card proved successful with national roll-out in the second half of fiscal year 2003/2004. Considerations for the improvement of customer service involve potential for relocating the fitting rooms and the customer service within them. (M&S Annual Review 2003 inside cover operating highlights) Year 2003 Financial Management – The chairman, Luc Vandevelde, believes that â€Å"the key to regaining market share has been a focus on improving both the appeal and value of our products, thereby making aspirational quality more accessible to our customers, The Home programme opening just prior to the launch of the credit and loyalty card in Financial Services. During the fiscal year 2003 operating